Advantages/Disadvantages of 'rolling release' Linux distros

Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 111
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

06 Mar 2015, 3:15 pm

Question to those of you 'in the know', what are the advantages and disadvantages of Linux distros that use 'rolling release' versus other methods of updates.

Many distros do not use 'rolling release' and I'm sure they have clear reasons for this choice. Please explain this issue, any insights would be appreciated.

Thanks.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

06 Mar 2015, 4:31 pm

The advantages of rolling releases are that new features are added much quicker and that bugs are fixed more quickly. It took forever before Linux Mint employed the new kernel fixes that stopped the infamous freeze-on-wakeup problem, but it was ready after a few days with Arch Linux.


_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”


slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 111
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

06 Mar 2015, 11:08 pm

Kurgan wrote:
The advantages of rolling releases are that new features are added much quicker and that bugs are fixed more quickly. It took forever before Linux Mint employed the new kernel fixes that stopped the infamous freeze-on-wakeup problem, but it was ready after a few days with Arch Linux.


are there any disadvantages from your perspective?